I’ve had a number of responses to my question ‘What’s the word?’ – the word to describe ourselves after a breast cancer diagnosis: Not my old self? Survivor? Thriver? Warrior? Victim? Battler?
Well, during the years after diagnosis and experiencing various treatment and surgeries I didn’t want to use the words of war, the military language. But now… now approaching the end of my fourth year since diagnosis, I would describe this, at times, as a battle. A battle to get up, to get dressed. Some days. To get out of the house. To get myself active, to do things. My ‘to do’ list looks daunting. Everyting feels too much. And I am battling the demons of despair – attempting to keep them away anyway.
 |
| Young Frank (on left) c. 1941 |
I remember my father, Frank, saying to me, “Oh, I know why they call this a battle. It’s such bloody hard work, that’s why.” His treatment for lung cancer. Unsuccessful, his battle so easily lost. Are we battling a losing war? A meaningless war. This ‘war on cancer’ that Nixon declared in 1971. ‘A cancer culture that favored the war metaphor. Images of swords and shields, fighting words and slogans,…’ (Gayle Sulik, Pink Ribbon Blues).
I remember Frank in his dying weeks, reflecting on the events of his life and telling me about his Uncle Sam coming home from fighting in the Second World War. He describes seeing him turn the corner into their road, slumped, coming home and dragging his rifle along the pavement, defeated. Is that me too? That even if I’ve not been killed I am defeated?
Here we are then. Frank, Uncle Sam, JaneRA , my posts seem to be full of dead people – and me – trying to find some sense in it all.
Extract from Being Sarah:
What happens to us, the women, in terms of breast cancer is, I feel, marginalised, of less importance than if it happened to men. But also I think that we don’t make things harder, we don’t challenge. We are for the most part, compliant. We accept breast cancer and its treatments. We deal with it, and we deal with it well. As Audre Lorde said, we are not a horde of raging angry women descending on government asking them to start researching the causes of breast cancer.
But we should be.
Instead we are donning pink t-shirts to support our sisters, raising money for the cancer charities, who search for cures, more drugs. Yes I can see a cure is attractive once you have breast cancer, but what about prevention? Have we blinkered ourselves with pink-tinted glasses here? Pink, sickly pink, the universal colour of hope. Where wearing pink and the fluffy pink campaigns around breast cancer are the norm. The ‘sugar-coating of disease’, as Barbara Ehrenreich calls it.
How come breast cancer has risen to this status? To an almost glamorous level? Just how did breast cancer get to be so glamorous? I get sick of seeing all these images of smiling women proving that we can ‘beat’ breast cancer. That we can be ‘survivors’. And I hate it. I do not want to be branded by breast cancer and wear pink t-shirts.
Women smiling through lost breasts, devastating effects of drugs and chemotherapy, women losing their most feminine identifiers, breasts and ovaries. But they are still smiling. They are survivors, they have fought, and beaten cancer. How I hate that terminology. The fighting and battling. These words we use for war.
And these women, these smiling women, they seem to say ‘It’s OK, because I have survived. So when it’s your turn….’ And here is the great unsaid – that your turn will come, because just look at the statistics – ‘When it’s your turn it will be OK,’ these smiling women reassure you.
It is profoundly not OK at all.
As I’ve said on here before, there are up days and there are down days. Up days contain no military metaphors at all, certainly not ‘victory’. But down days, like this one, do somehow feel like a battle. Confusing.